Why John Roberts’ defense of the Supreme Court was so wildly unpersuasive

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts is clearly aware of public perceptions related to the high court, though he apparently wants Americans to see him and fellow justices as above the political fray. The Associated Press reported on his latest public remarks:

This Video Is Trending Right Now →

“I think, at a very basic level, people think we’re making policy decisions, we’re saying we think this is how things should be, as opposed to what the law provides,” he said. “I think they view us as purely political actors, which I don’t think is an accurate understanding of what we do.”

His remarks to a conference of judges and lawyers from the 3rd U.S. Circuit in Pennsylvania came at a time of low public confidence in the court, and about a week after the court handed down a decision that hollowed out the Voting Rights Act.

As part of the same remarks, Roberts went on to argue that sitting justices are not “part of the political process … and I’m not sure people grasp that as much as is appropriate.”

The chief justice’s impression of public attitudes was the only element of this that was compelling: In recent years, a wide variety of national polls really have found Americans’ confidence in the Supreme Court collapsing to unprecedented depths.

Occasionally, the jurists make a modest effort to argue that the public is mistaken. In 2021, as part of her first public speech after she was confirmed under highly controversial circumstances, Justice Amy Coney B arrett declared, “My goal today is to convince you that this court is not comprised of a bunch of partisan hacks.”

(The conservative justice could’ve picked a better forum: Barrett made the comments alongside then-Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell, who rushed her onto the bench as part of a brazenly political scheme, at a University of Louisville center that bears his name.)

Justice Brett Kavanaugh made similar comments in 2023, insisting that the Supreme Court is “an institution of law, not of politics, not of partisanship.” He added that he believes that the current lineup of justices has succeeded in “deciding cases based on law and not based on partisan affiliation and partisanship.”

Roberts’ latest pitch, in other words, was part of a series of defenses that appear to have no discernible effect on changing public perceptions.

It’s incumbent on the justices to consider not only why most Americans believe the Supreme Court is motivated by politics but also their own role in fueling the problem they apparently find offensive.