Judge orders DOJ to produce more unredacted Epstein files — or explain why it won’t

A federal judge ordered acting Attorney General Todd Blanche to produce more unredacted files related to Jeffrey Epstein or demonstrate by next week why the Justice Department was justified in withholding or redacting the files at issue.

This Video Is Trending Right Now →

In an order issued Thursday, U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan found that Blanche “has conceded that he is in violation” of the Epstein Files Transparency Act and therefore must take steps to comply with the act or “show cause” as to why the DOJ cannot do so by July 2.

Specifically, Sullivan ordered that Blanche must remove redactions from a number of files that the Justice Department previously released, including notes from FBI interviews with a woman who accused President Donald Trump of sexually abusing her when she was a teenager after Epstein allegedly introduced them. He must also remove redactions from documents discussing alleged co-conspirators and from emails with Epstein in which the senders’ and recipients’ identities are obscured. And he must initiate the translation of Epstein-related documents in foreign languages and catalog the redactions made in the Epstein files.

If Blanche does not fulfill the requirements above, he must explain to the court why he cannot do so.

The court order came in response to a lawsuit filed by Katie Phang, an attorney and former MS NOW anchor. Phang sued the DOJ in April for failing to abide by the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which Trump signed into law in November under pressure from his base, arguing that their failures to release certain information publicly made it “impossible” for her to do her job as an independent journalist.

In an interview with progressive media company MeidasTouch on Thursday, Phang emphasized that Sullivan’s court order requires Blanche to produce the documents to the public and not just to her.

“And this is why I brought this lawsuit in the beginning. We needed this transparency as the American public, and we had to force the DOJ to have to do this,” she said.

The Justice Department’s patchy release of the files and the sloppy redactions that have concealed identities of potential co-conspirators and male associates while exposing survivors’ identifying details have been subject to intense criticism from the public.

In February, MS NOW confirmed that the Justice Department had withheld dozens of pages of FBI notes and memos from interviews with the woman who accused Trump of sexually abusing her when she was a young teenager after Epstein introduced them. At the time, the DOJ said that no documents had been deleted but that some files were “temporarily pulled for victim redactions or to redact Personally Identifiable Information” and would subsequently be made public.